A quick comparison between Today Tejas, Shatabdi and double Decker.
Class__Train Number__Total Seats__Passengers boarded from NDLS+GZB___Occupancy %
CC___82502__702__417___59.4%
CC___12034__1170__514___43.93%
CC___12582__1200__312___26%...
more...
EC___82502__112___47___41.96%
EC___12034__56___20___35.71%
So it is clearly visible that despite having more stoppages, Tejas is getting more occupancy then Shatabdi and Double Decker.
Around 50% occupancy cannot be a loss maker because fare is almost double then Shatabdi and Double Decker.
please wait...Translate to EnglishToday's Tejas, Shatabdi, and Double Decker trains have been compared. Here are the details:
Class__Train Number__Total Seats__Passengers from NDLS+GZB___Occupancy %
CC___82502__702__417___59.4%
CC___12034__1170__514___43.93%
CC___12582__1200__312___26%
EC___82502__112___47___41.96%
EC___12034__56___20___35.71%
Tejas has more stops but still has higher occupancy than Shatabdi and Double Decker. Occupancy of around 50% is not a loss because the fare is almost double than Shatabdi and Double Decker.